April 20, 2007
Tom Plate is a bumbling, liberal idiot.
Who obviously doesn't understand the reason why the Writers of the Constitution placed the second amendment in there.
Ted Nugent, on the other hand knows what he is talking about. He understands that the right to bear arms is to protect yourself and others. You know...to prevent things like the VA tech massacre from happning.
Gun-Free zones are a danger to the people who live in them. The only people who are gun free are the people who abide by the laws. The evil criminals, who you know...dont care about the law, wont care if its a gun-free zone. They will take advantage of those who are unarmed.
The second amendment is important and it must be protected.
Posted by: NthPower at
05:10 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
Well, the supremes recently threw out the DC gun ban, so it isn't likely that any restrictions will be enacted anytime soon. Maybe a better connection between mental health service records and criminal records. I can't say where that would be too bad of a thing, or too intrusive.
I read both articles; didn't like either of them, tho. Neither of them would convince anybody one way or another (even if you managed somebody who could be convinced to change their minds--a rarity with politics).
Posted by: McGurk at April 23, 2007 03:09 PM (Ri74D)
34 queries taking 0.041 seconds, 55 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
